Reformed Churchmen

We are Confessional Calvinists and a Prayer Book Church-people. In 2012, we remembered the 350th anniversary of the 1662 Book of Common Prayer; also, we remembered the 450th anniversary of John Jewel's sober, scholarly, and Reformed "An Apology of the Church of England." In 2013, we remembered the publication of the "Heidelberg Catechism" and the influence of Reformed theologians in England, including Heinrich Bullinger's Decades. For 2014: Tyndale's NT translation. For 2015, John Roger, Rowland Taylor and Bishop John Hooper's martyrdom, burned at the stakes. Books of the month. December 2014: Alan Jacob's "Book of Common Prayer" at: http://www.amazon.com/Book-Common-Prayer-Biography-Religious/dp/0691154813/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1417814005&sr=8-1&keywords=jacobs+book+of+common+prayer. January 2015: A.F. Pollard's "Thomas Cranmer and the English Reformation: 1489-1556" at: http://www.amazon.com/Thomas-Cranmer-English-Reformation-1489-1556/dp/1592448658/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1420055574&sr=8-1&keywords=A.F.+Pollard+Cranmer. February 2015: Jaspar Ridley's "Thomas Cranmer" at: http://www.amazon.com/Thomas-Cranmer-Jasper-Ridley/dp/0198212879/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1422892154&sr=8-1&keywords=jasper+ridley+cranmer&pebp=1422892151110&peasin=198212879

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Arminianism and a Calvinistic Prayer Book Churchman, Augustus Toplady

One great contest, between the religion of Arminianism, and the religion of Christ, is, who shall stand entitled to the praise and glory of a sinner’s salvation? Conversion decides this point at once; for I think that, without any imputation of uncharitableness, I may venture to say, that every truly awakened person, at least when he is under the shine of God’s countenance upon his soul, will fall down upon his knees, with this hymn of praise ascending from his heart, Not unto me, O Lord, not unto me, but to thy name, give the glory: I am saved not for my righteousness, but for thy mercy and thy truth’s sake.

AUGUSTUS TOPLADY

2 comments:

Unknown said...

Many in reformed circles believe that arminianism is heresy. I know this is true. What I don't understand is how reformed believers call arminianism heresy and then say that an arminian is a true believer regardless of what they believe. If one believes heresy then why is he not called a heritic? What is the line that must be crossed as far as a persons theology goes? Does not heresy separate a man from God? If they believe in a god that responds to them instead of the God of the Bible who initiates salvation is this not a god made according to their design?

Reformation said...

Derrick:

1. I strongly sense the same frustration.

2. I strongly sense the instinct to compassion, also, which--as you note, creates the problem of #1 above.

3. Practically speaking (without a theoretical answer to your question), I generally give wide berth and patience to pew-Arminians, the rank and file. However, if they are leaders, pastors and advocates of this heresy, I have little patience for them and call them "heretics." I also do this with any local or vocal laymen who are unteachable on the matter.

4. This is how I deal with pew-Papists and pew-Tractarians. Patience and teaching. However, for the leadership, life gets rough for them from my standpoint.

5. This does not answer the good question...where is the line drawn.

6. But practically, this is how I deal with it. For example, I believe that 70-80%, the largest segment, of the SBC--at the leadership level--is Arminian and has leaders who are heretics. You may quote me on that. It's "works religion" and "works salvation" outside the instruction of Romans.

Regards,
Philip